Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K3100M +156%
1.084 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
45.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1084 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
45.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF106
N15E-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy