Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1163MHz vs 1124MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +55%
1.786 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K1200 +22%
131
Quadro M2000
107
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM206
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy