Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
18112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +7528%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
57.02GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
1344
Shading Units
19456
112
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
89.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.142 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
89.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy