Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA PG506 232 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM PG506 232 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1590MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (80W vs 165W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
PG506 232 +262%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2020
Tesla
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1440 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
3072bit
Memory Bus
128bit
933.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
896
224
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
32
224
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
24 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

138.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
322.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
10.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
10.32 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
5.161 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy