Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (225W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +71%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2012
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
2688
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
235W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy