Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (275W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +412%
44.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X
8.602 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +370%
24344
Radeon R9 FURY X
5173
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +286%
116
Radeon R9 FURY X
30
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +238%
220
Radeon R9 FURY X
65
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +272%
298
Radeon R9 FURY X
80
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 40
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

66
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
8448
Shading Units
4096
264
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Fiji
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

285W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy