Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2610MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER +769%
44.1 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

66
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
8448
Shading Units
2816
264
TMUs
176
96
ROPs
64
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Hawaii
AD103-275-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

285W
TDP
235W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy