Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1605MHz vs 1300MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +54%
8.218 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
5.325 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jun 2023
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
256
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
DG2-256
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
146 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

35W
TDP
95W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy