Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +363%
6.05 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
960
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Blackcomb
-
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy