Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (2000MHz vs 1275MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 30.5W 8Gbps
2.285 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +79%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1275 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
71.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
4.570 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.285 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
71.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

31W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy