Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 860M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1085MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 860M +15%
1.389 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX350 +8%
1248
GeForce GTX 860M
1149
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
1020 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GM107
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N15P-GX-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy