Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1665MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 +172%
2.984 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
420 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
384
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU117
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy