Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1665MHz vs 1560MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H +542%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA104
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
140W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy