Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
0.044 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +2063%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2011
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 9
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
16
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT218S
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy