Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +119%
4.416 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2019
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
1280
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
TU116
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy