Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

AMD FireStream 9270 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +2757%
1.2 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jun 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
2
800
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
RV610
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
RV610 LE (215LKCAKA14FG)
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy