Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro W600 vs AMD FirePro W7000

AMD FirePro W600 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +216%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
20
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cape Verde
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cape Verde PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy