Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FireStream 9170

ATI FirePro V8800 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 208W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V8800 +431%
2.64 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
4
1600
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV670
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

208W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy