Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 560X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1275MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560X +40%
2.611 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2018
FirePro
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1175 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1275 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
16
1280
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.40 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
81.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.611 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.611 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
163.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
3 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy