Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (289W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +1240%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
GT200B
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
289W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy