Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +939%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
8
4096
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
75W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy