Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4016 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9300 X2 +9883%
7.987 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
1
4096
Shading Units
80
256
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Capsaicin
GPU Name
M93
Capsaicin XT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy