Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD FirePro S9150 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S9150 +132%
5.069 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
20
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
158.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.069 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Hawaii GL44
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy