Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M4150

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD FirePro M4150

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +137%
1.306 TFLOPS
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
6
960
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.32 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Opal
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy