Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6900 XT +958%
23.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
80
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
288.0 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
720.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.08 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1440 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 21
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy