Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro S7000

ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000 +1588%
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Aug 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
3
Compute Units
20
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV630
GPU Name
Pitcairn
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

73W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy