Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1837MHz vs 1440MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 24GB)
13312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1TB/s vs 4.10TB/s)
Lower TDP (165W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +501%
62.08 TFLOPS
PG506 242
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Apr 2021
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
4.10TB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
16896
Shading Units
3584
528
TMUs
224
24
ROPs
96
528
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
-
Blackwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
208 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

1000W
TDP
165W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
9.0
CUDA
8.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy