Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1543MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +166%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Pascal
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy