CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200
VS
Intel Arctic Sound-M
NVIDIA Quadro K1200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M
+1181%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro K1200
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
2
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
3
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
4
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
5
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
7
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA L40
8
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA GRID K200
9
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
10
Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy