Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +1181%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2015
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
45W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy