Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (260W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +8%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Aug 2018
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
4608
240
TMUs
288
120
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
260W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy