Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro S7150

Intel Arc A750 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +356%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2016
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
3584
Shading Units
2048
224
TMUs
128
112
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Tonga
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy