Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A530M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

Intel Arc A530M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A530M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A530M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1300MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A530M +62%
3.994 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
1024
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
12
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.7 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy