Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

Intel Arc A310 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (2350MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +79%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2022
Alchemist
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
8
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
DG2-128
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy