UHD Graphics 630 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 630 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
UHD Graphics 630 Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Advantages
136 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 630
423
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+73%
736
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
HD Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
184
Shading Units
320
23
TMUs
40
3
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
3.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
26.45 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
846.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
423.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Comet Lake GT2
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm+++
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1
