UHD Graphics 620 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 620 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
UHD Graphics 620 Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1150MHz vs 1000MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 620
384
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+91%
736
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
1000 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
192
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
40
3
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
768.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
96.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
45W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Whiskey Lake GT2
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
Generation 9.5
Architecture
Generation 7.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
