Tesla C2070 vs Quadro RTX 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro RTX 5000 Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1028
Quadro RTX 5000
+984%
11150
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
48
448
Shading Units
3072
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
