Tesla C2070 vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K5200 Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1028
Quadro K5200
+245%
3553
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
2304
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK110B
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
