Tesla C2070 vs Quadro K4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2070 Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
Quadro K4000M Advantages
Released 11 months late
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1028
Quadro K4000M
+12%
1154
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
747 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
960
56
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
