Tesla C2070 vs GRID K240Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2070 Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
GRID K240Q Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1028
GRID K240Q
+122%
2289
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GK104
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
