Tesla C2070 vs GRID A100B
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2070 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Tesla C2070 Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 400W)
GRID A100B Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2070
1028
GRID A100B
+1251%
13890
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
108
448
Shading Units
6912
56
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA100
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
