T600 vs Radeon R9 255 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
T600 Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1335MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T600
+79%
1709
Radeon R9 255 OEM
952
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Dec 2013
Quadro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
10
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
53.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
3.418 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.709 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
53.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1