RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 73% (1335MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+53%
5468
Quadro K5200
3553
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A500 Embedded
+26%
2628
Quadro K5200
2072
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK110B
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
