RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2000 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+4613%
5468
Quadro FX 880M
116
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
6
2048
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
