RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 360M Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 20W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+20930%
5468
Quadro FX 360M
26
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
2
2048
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
17W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
