RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 42W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+8061%
5468
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
67
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
4
2048
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G84
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
