RTX A500 Embedded vs Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A500 Embedded Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 142W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+1025%
5468
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
486
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
8
2048
Shading Units
256
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GF100
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
