RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Advantages
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 130W)
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Workstation Ada
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
-
192
TMUs
2
64
ROPs
2
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
15W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona
(355-0025-221)
(355-0025-221)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
180 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-
