RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 620 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
6096 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 620 OEM Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+17034%
26730
GeForce GT 620 OEM
156
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2012
Workstation Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s
Render Config
48
SM Count
1
6144
Shading Units
48
192
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GF119
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
