RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs FireStream 9270
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
5344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+2127%
26730
FireStream 9270
1200
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Nov 2008
Workstation Ada
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
800
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1