RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6104 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+63542%
26730
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
42
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Workstation Ada
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
20GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
40
192
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
139.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
RV610
-
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP
(215LKBALA15FG)
(215LKBALA15FG)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0